MG TF Review (2002-2011)

Pros and cons
What we like
Fun to drive
Affordable to buy and run
Cars with a hard-top are practical all year round
What to consider
Harsh ride
Cramped, low-quality cabin
Versions with a CVT auto are nothing like as enjoyable to drive
The CarGurus verdict
The MG TF is good-looking, fun to drive and incredibly good value these days, which makes it a very tempting choice if you’re in the market for a cost-effective two-seater sports car. Don’t be deterred by the fact the company went bust; maintaining one is easy and actually surprisingly affordable, even today.
That said, the TF is flawed; build quality isn’t as good as it could be, the interior is dated and cramped, and there are some reliability issues that, while easily resolved, can still put a crimp on your enjoyment of the car.
So while the TF is worth a look, especially if its styling appeals and your budget is tight, the fact its rivals are even more enjoyable to drive, just as widely available and, usually, not that much more expensive to buy, means they tend to make more sense.
out of 5 expert review

What owners say
great value ,fantastic road holding , sports cars that are a lot more expensive i will get the same experience for a lot less.
7 April 2021Three things to know
- Although the two cars look similar, there are quite a few differences between the TF and its predecessor, the F. Chief among these is the suspension; the original F used a quirky setup with gas-filled spheres instead of springs and dampers in pursuit of comfort, but this did little for the handling. The TF switched to more conventional suspension system, which sharpened up the handling, but also firmed up the ride – to an intolerable degree, some felt – and the TF also benefitted from a more rigid shell than the F.
- Only one of these engines was made available when the TF was re-launched in 2008: the lower-powered 1.8-litre, now rebranded N-Series and tweaked to meet more modern emissions regulations and detuned slightly to 133bhp. The revitalised range was spearheaded by a limited-edition run of 500 cars, badged LE500, with leather seats and a hard-top as standard, and these command a premium over earlier TFs, as well as standard versions of the later cars.
- The MG TF scored a respectable four out of five stars for adult occupant protection when it was crash tested by Euro NCAP in 2003. Although the cockpit doesn’t feature a dedicated roll bar, its reinforced windscreen was designed to provide a degree of protection in the event of the car ending up upside down.
Which one to buy
- If you want the best buy: We reckon the smart money chooses a tidy example of the pre-2005 TF 135. Sure, it doesn’t quite offer the heady power of the TF 160, but as a result, prices are lower. You get a slightly softer chassis setup, too, which better suits the TF; the more hardcore nature of the 160 feels a little at odds with the cruisey driving position and olde worlde interior.
- If you must have an automatic: There’s always the TF 120, but we’d strongly advise against opting for this model. For one thing, it’s down on power; for another, the CVT gearbox saps performance even further, and the way it holds the engine revs up high while you’re accelerating is distinctly unsporting and really rather irritating.
- If fuel costs are a concern: You might want to seek out a TF 115, because this is the most efficient TF of all. Having said that, the gutless engine makes it feel rather dull to drive, which is one compromise you could probably do without in a car that already has its flaws
- If you simply must have the newest TF of all: Go all-out and get the LE 500. It might be the most expensive, but it’s also the model that’s most likely to hold its value and be worth something to a collector in a few years’ time. Just make sure you’re happy with the fact that you’ll have to pay over the odds compared with an earlier car.











